Voici une solution thread-safe pour le problème:
https://svn.code.sf.net/p/loggifier/code/trunk/de.unkrig.commons.lang/src/de/unkrig/commons/lang/security/Sandbox.java
package de.unkrig.commons.lang.security;
import java.security.AccessControlContext;
import java.security.Permission;
import java.security.Permissions;
import java.security.ProtectionDomain;
import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.WeakHashMap;
import de.unkrig.commons.nullanalysis.Nullable;
/**
* This class establishes a security manager that confines the permissions for code executed through specific classes,
* which may be specified by class, class name and/or class loader.
* <p>
* To 'execute through a class' means that the execution stack includes the class. E.g., if a method of class {@code A}
* invokes a method of class {@code B}, which then invokes a method of class {@code C}, and all three classes were
* previously {@link #confine(Class, Permissions) confined}, then for all actions that are executed by class {@code C}
* the <i>intersection</i> of the three {@link Permissions} apply.
* <p>
* Once the permissions for a class, class name or class loader are confined, they cannot be changed; this prevents any
* attempts (e.g. of the confined class itself) to release the confinement.
* <p>
* Code example:
* <pre>
* Runnable unprivileged = new Runnable() {
* public void run() {
* System.getProperty("user.dir");
* }
* };
*
* // Run without confinement.
* unprivileged.run(); // Works fine.
*
* // Set the most strict permissions.
* Sandbox.confine(unprivileged.getClass(), new Permissions());
* unprivileged.run(); // Throws a SecurityException.
*
* // Attempt to change the permissions.
* {
* Permissions permissions = new Permissions();
* permissions.add(new AllPermission());
* Sandbox.confine(unprivileged.getClass(), permissions); // Throws a SecurityException.
* }
* unprivileged.run();
* </pre>
*/
public final
class Sandbox {
private Sandbox() {}
private static final Map<Class<?>, AccessControlContext>
CHECKED_CLASSES = Collections.synchronizedMap(new WeakHashMap<Class<?>, AccessControlContext>());
private static final Map<String, AccessControlContext>
CHECKED_CLASS_NAMES = Collections.synchronizedMap(new HashMap<String, AccessControlContext>());
private static final Map<ClassLoader, AccessControlContext>
CHECKED_CLASS_LOADERS = Collections.synchronizedMap(new WeakHashMap<ClassLoader, AccessControlContext>());
static {
// Install our custom security manager.
if (System.getSecurityManager() != null) {
throw new ExceptionInInitializerError("There's already a security manager set");
}
System.setSecurityManager(new SecurityManager() {
@Override public void
checkPermission(@Nullable Permission perm) {
assert perm != null;
for (Class<?> clasS : this.getClassContext()) {
// Check if an ACC was set for the class.
{
AccessControlContext acc = Sandbox.CHECKED_CLASSES.get(clasS);
if (acc != null) acc.checkPermission(perm);
}
// Check if an ACC was set for the class name.
{
AccessControlContext acc = Sandbox.CHECKED_CLASS_NAMES.get(clasS.getName());
if (acc != null) acc.checkPermission(perm);
}
// Check if an ACC was set for the class loader.
{
AccessControlContext acc = Sandbox.CHECKED_CLASS_LOADERS.get(clasS.getClassLoader());
if (acc != null) acc.checkPermission(perm);
}
}
}
});
}
// --------------------------
/**
* All future actions that are executed through the given {@code clasS} will be checked against the given {@code
* accessControlContext}.
*
* @throws SecurityException Permissions are already confined for the {@code clasS}
*/
public static void
confine(Class<?> clasS, AccessControlContext accessControlContext) {
if (Sandbox.CHECKED_CLASSES.containsKey(clasS)) {
throw new SecurityException("Attempt to change the access control context for '" + clasS + "'");
}
Sandbox.CHECKED_CLASSES.put(clasS, accessControlContext);
}
/**
* All future actions that are executed through the given {@code clasS} will be checked against the given {@code
* protectionDomain}.
*
* @throws SecurityException Permissions are already confined for the {@code clasS}
*/
public static void
confine(Class<?> clasS, ProtectionDomain protectionDomain) {
Sandbox.confine(
clasS,
new AccessControlContext(new ProtectionDomain[] { protectionDomain })
);
}
/**
* All future actions that are executed through the given {@code clasS} will be checked against the given {@code
* permissions}.
*
* @throws SecurityException Permissions are already confined for the {@code clasS}
*/
public static void
confine(Class<?> clasS, Permissions permissions) {
Sandbox.confine(clasS, new ProtectionDomain(null, permissions));
}
// Code for 'CHECKED_CLASS_NAMES' and 'CHECKED_CLASS_LOADERS' omitted here.
}
Commentez s'il vous plaît!
CU
Arno
Thread.stopcausera des problèmes dans le code de la bibliothèque Java. De même, le code de la bibliothèque Java nécessitera des autorisations. Beaucoup mieux pour permettre l'SecurityManagerutilisationjava.security.AccessController. Le chargeur de classe devrait probablement également autoriser l'accès aux propres classes du code utilisateur.